Friday, 28 September 2012

Simple crown wrap tutorial


Start with your hair in dual Dutch braids. French braids might work too, but I find Dutch braids with the distinct braid-part showing works well for this.
Braid a long, thin scarf into the thinnest braid.


Cross the braids in the neck and wrap the braid without the scarf around your head. If you can tuck it under well enough, you don’t need any pins to secure it.


Wrap the braid with the scarf around your head and make sure you have the second braid over the first braid to pin it in.


Wrap the scarf around the tassel (Not necessary I guess, but I think the end result is sleeker and prettier)


If the scarf is very long, wrap it around your head with the braids. If not, pull the scarf under your braids.


I like taking the scarf around in the shape of an infinity sign. And done!


Just because I felt like it, I matched my toenails to the scarf! (Metallic tone in the polish made it hard to capture) 

Monday, 24 September 2012

Hairy thought of the day: Hair oil hype


I find myself being vaguely mystified by the attitude towards oil in beauty products. Suddenly “hair oils” is the big fat hype, but oil on the scalp is something bad that will clog the pores and keep hair from growing. Hm, come to think about it, isn’t that what they said about conditioners? You can find (Expensive!) facial oils and products like foundations and creams that boast of being oil free because oil in foundations and creams will block the pores but the oil in facial oils are really, really good for your skin. M-hm.
Meh. Maybe my little fit of sarcastic detachment and mocking current trends is just old and tired already. Bizarre double standards like this have been around for long and will keep around for just as long to come…
The recent hair-oil-hype just tends to annoy me. Just like I’m tired of hearing of BB creams in skincare. They have been around for ages (In Asia) but have recently become the “It” thing in skincare in the West too. And just like the original BB creams were packed with functions and benefits, the “new” ones are bastardized tinted moisturizers. The “Hair oils” we see hyped today are bastardized low oil, high everything-else versions of what longhairs have used for years without “anyone” paying attention…

Sunday, 23 September 2012

Leave in conditioner reviews


All quotes in the ingredient-analysis from Cosmeticsinfo

Scandinavia Formula glansdroppar (“Shine drops”) bought at Åhlens for 40 kronor (50 ml)
Looks and image
This one felt annoyingly cheap. Cheap, shiny plastic and cheap print in only two colours, the product in all feels almost “pharmacy product”-like. Yet it came in a tiny little bottle that usually signals something a little more exclusive. Hm? Text is quite non-nonsense and aware of just being for silicone drops.
Scent
Completely neutral. But I don’t see any perfume listed either so I guess that explains it.
Touch
The product is a very runny and slippery liquid.
Rinse ability
Difficult! Even with soap I felt I had leftover product on my hands. This is a serious cone-product.
Usability
This thing has the Worst. Pump. Ever! With wet and slippery fingers it was plain impossible to use. The top of the pump is curved so your fingers simply slip off it when you try to press it.Doesn’t offer any hold but adds a lot of shine. 
Price and value
0,8 kronor per ml.
Ingredients
Dimethicone: Cyclomethicone (Cyclopentasiloxane), Dimethiconeol, Phenyl Trimethicone, Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexyl Dimethyl PAB.
Whatever your attitude towards cones is, there is nothing dangerous or potentially irritating in this product. Some of the cones may require SLS to effectively wash off though. I guess it comes down to what you value in your hair products. Me, I like cones and worry about potential scalp irritants.
Conclusion
It’s a serious shine and cone-product but I think I would like it better if I would add some of this to my regular old Sunsilk.
Meh.

L’Oreal Everpure lasting moisture leave in-crème bought at H&M for 109 kronor (150 ml)
Looks and image
I quite liked the bottle. It is obviously plastic once you touch it, but it looks vaguely metallic from a distance. In some lights it seems greyer overall and in some lights purple or pinker. I quite liked it. Promises nourishment, shine and non-greasiness. Says “No sulphates!” on the label so that in combination with the “Pure” appeals to people wanting a “clean” product.
Scent
Soapy, “laundry” kind of scent.
Touch
The product is rather gel-like. Feels a little thick but works fine.
Rinse ability
Easy to rinse. I felt no residue even without using soap.
Usability
It felt pretty thick when I tested it first but extremely thick when I used it on my hair. Maybe the scent changed once it got in contact with water and hair too, since the scent changed to weird and unpleasant. It didn’t stay dominant though. The thick gel-formula also made my hands and combs extremely “greasy” and slippery so I managed to drop the comb twice. It made me quite annoyed with it. It didn’t do anything for shine or glossiness. Hubby sniffed my braid and promptly complained about the scent: “It smells like furniture polish!” he said. The next day when I combed my hair out for my morning shower, it felt distinctly “glue-ish”. Ew and ick. My hair definitely wasn’t happy with this stuff.
Price and value
0,72 kronor per ml.
Ingredients
Aqua/Water, Glycerin, Propylene Glycol, Polyquaternium 10, PEG 12 Dimethicone,
Oleth 20 tocopherol: "Data on the Oleth ingredients indicated evidence of mild to moderate eye and skin irritation”
Phenoxyethanol,
Ethylexyl Methoxycinnamate: “There are studies that suggest that some sunscreen ingredients, including Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate may have activity like the hormone, estrogen”
Polyquaternium 4,
Limonene: “In Europe, Limonene is included on the list of “allergenic” substances.”
Benzophenone 4: “When undiluted, some Benzophenones, were slightly irritating to the skin and eyes. At concentrations used in cosmetics and personal care products, Benzophenoens were not irritating. There are studies that suggest that some sunscreen ingredients, including Oxybenzone may have activity like the hormone, estrogen.”
Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Leaf Extract Peppermint: ”Isolated clinical cases of irritation and/or sensitization to Mentha Piperita (Peppermint) Oil and/or its components have been reported”
Linalool: “In Europe, Linalool is included on the list of “allergenic” substances.”
Sorbitol: I had to read this one twice, lol. Yes, the sugar substitute I know from food is used as a humectant and skin conditioning agent as well.
Geraniol: “In Europe, Geraniol is included on the list of "allergenic" substances.”
Rosmarinus Officinalis (Rosemary Leaf Oil) ,
Methylparaben: Ah, parabens. Just speaking the word can send some people into a frenzy. I’m not so convinced but none the less: “The CIR Expert Panel discussed “paraben paradox” in which paraben-sensitive patients can tolerate paraben-containing cosmetics applied to normal, unbroken skin but not when applied to eczematous or ulcerated skin.”
Butylphenyl Methlyproprional: “In Europe, Butylphenyl Methylpropional is included on the list of "allergenic" substances.”
Citronellol: I had a good laugh at this part of the description: “Citronellol is used in perfumes and insect repellents, and as a mite attractant.” Ehm. Huh?
Coumarin: “In Europe, Coumarin is included on the list of “allergenic” substances.” And a bit of history: “It occurs widely in natural products, and has been has been an important ingredient in perfumes since 1882.”
Parfum/Fragrance
10 potential irritants out of 21 ingredients! Yikes! So much for being a “Pure” product.
Conclusion
It made my hair quite difficult to manage, it didn’t make my hair glossier and hubby didn’t approve of the scent. I’m annoyed at having found almost half the ingredients being potentially irritating. I think I will use this one up but not buy it again. I find it ironic that the ingredients are so potentially irritating when it appeals to the people looking to avoid “bad” ingredients.
No, thank you

L’Oreal extraordinary oil (SPF version) bought at H&M for 119 kronor (100 ml)
Looks and image
This product is all over in the media at the moment. The ads are quite difficult to avoid if you read anything remotely “girly” actually. The ads have greatly annoyed me: They seem to be the textbook example of “fluffy jargon” about the luxurious and exotic oils it contains.
I was quite pleased to see they haven’t spread that crap all over the bottle. The bottle left me mildly irritated: It’s real glass and quite slippery with dry hands alone. I can just picture it slipping out of my wet hands trying to spread some product in my hair. Smash! Evil little glass shards all over my bathroom floor.
Scent
Hmm, not sure how to describe this one? “Warm”? It reminds me of a perfume, but I can’t remember the name.
Touch
Very runny!
Rinse ability
I needed soap to wash this one off and even then I felt I had residue left.
Usability
The extreme runniness of this one made it very difficult to distribute in my hair. It took a long time to put enough product in my long hair before I felt satisfied. Of course it didn’t help that the pump dispenses very little product at the time either! Once it was in, it felt pretty good actually. Not too greasy or cone-y. To my surprise it even felt like it had a bit of hold too. Strangely, for an oil and cone-product my hair almost felt dry the next day.
Price and value
1,19 kronor per ml. The most expensive one of the 4 tested.
Ingredients
Cyclopentasiloxane, alcohol denat, phenyl trimethicone, dimethiconol,
c12-15 alkyl benzoate: Gosh, what a name! It sounds horrible and toxic but none the less it has no bad remarks. This is a Long-chain alkyl benzoate ester for those interested.
chamomilla recutita extract/matricaria flower extract: As the Latin name suggests, this is chamomile.
cocos nucifera oil/ coconut oil,
ethylhexyl methoxycinnamate: “There are studies that suggest that some sunscreen ingredients, including Ethylhexyl Methoxycinnamate may have activity like the hormone, estrogen.”
nelumbuim speciosum extract/nelumbuim speciosum flower extract: This is a lotus flower. Weird it’s only named by the Latin names?
benzyl alcohol: “Although, genotoxicity tests for these ingredients were mostly negative, there were some assays that were positive.”
Cinnamal: “In Europe, Cinnamal is included on the list of "allergenic" substances.” Hah, good to see that my belief that natural doesn’t mean safe is backed up by science. “Cinnamal is a naturally occurring fragrance compound found in the bark of cinnamon trees.” Cool.  
Linalool: “In Europe, Linalool is included on the list of “allergenic” substances.”
linum usitatissimum flower extract: Linseed flower extract. Weird it’s only named by the Latin names?
caprylic/capric triglyceride: “…is an oily liquid made from coconut oil.” and “…slows the loss of water from the skin by forming a barrier on the skin’s surface.”
gardenia tahitensis flower extract: This is Tahitian gardenia. Hm, I wonder why they haven’t smeared that all over the package? “Contains exotic Tahitian gardenia flower extract!” Hah.
rosa canina flower extract: A wild rose species commonly known as “Dog rose”. In Denmark the fruits of this plant can be used for jams and teas.
Bisabolol: What an awful name for something that  “…is the main component of the essential oil made from the German chamomile plant”
glycine soja oil/soybean.
parfum/fragrance (F.I.LC51164/2)
I wonder why they use so many of the Latin names on the ingredient list instead of the “prettier” common English ones. Maybe they don’t expect their consumers to actually read the label?
Anyways, I only see 4 “real” oils listed and 6 “extract of…”s on the ingredients. Not entirely what the label promised me.
4 potential irritants out of 18 ingredients
Conclusion
I think this would be a product I would buy again and use a bit of in my regular Sunsilk conditioner. I was actually pleasantly surprised. After the hype I expected it to be crap.
Thumb up

Schwarzkopf Gliss hair repair bought at H&M for 69,50 kronor (125 ml)
Looks and image
My goodness, this looks and feels plain old cheap. Even though I quite like the colours and adore the concave shape of the bottle (Easier grip on this sucker! The Extraordinary Oil could learn a lesson from here!) the bottle feels really cheap.
Scent
The scent made me go “WTF” as first. I’m not sure how to describe it. Like soapy apples I guess? It is not unpleasant, it is just unusual and a bit of a strange combination.
Touch
Thin foam.
Rinse ability
Easy to rinse off my hands. Even without soap I felt I got rid of the residue.
Usability
Hm. The thinness of the foam made it quite difficult (And messy!) to distribute. One it was in, it felt pretty good. It added some hold and shine. I redid a Figure 8 bun into a simple braid for sleeping and found to my surprise that the product had added some volume. It felt post-cassia thick. I had spotted that it said “volume” on the bottle but didn’t actually expect it to have any effect.
Price and value
0,55 kronor per ml. The cheapest of the 4 tested.
Ingredients
Aqua,
Cetrimonium chloride: “[Is a] quaternary ammonium salt.” Yikes, that sounds drying? “…safe for use in rinse-off products and were safe for use at concentrations of up to 0.25% in leave-on products” But this is ingredient #2, so yikes?!
Hydrolyzed Collagen: “Hydrolyzed Collagen generally is adsorbed on hair, increasing tensile strength and elongation.” Cool.
Panthenol,
Cocodimonium Hydroxypropyl Hydrolyzed Keratin: I really wondered if they had forgotten a comma somewhere here.  Some mouthful of a name!
Hydrolyzed Keratin, Stereamidopropyl Dimethylamine, Phenoxyethanol,
Ceteareth-25: “Ceteareth ingredients should not be used on damaged skin.”
PEG-12 Dimethicone,
Lactic acid: A bit of history: “Lactic acid, derived primarily from milk and its origins can be traced back to Cleopatra, who purportedly used sour milk on her skin.”
Dipalmitoylethyl Dimonium Chloride,
Silicone Quaternium-22: “Enhances the appearance and feel of hair by increasing hair body, suppleness, and sheen; or by improving the texture of hair that has been damaged physically or by chemical treatment. It also prevents or inhibits the buildup of static electricity.” Not bad!
Sodium Methylparaben, VP/VA Copolymer, PPG-3 Myristyl Ether, Coco-betaine, Poly quaternium-69, Glycerin, Propylene Glycol, Parfum, Polyquaternium-10, Styrene/VP copolymer, Alcohol denat., Citric Acid,
Sodium Chloride: Plain old table salt.
PEG-14M, Hexyl Cinnamal, Amyl Cinnamal,
Limonene: “In Europe, Limonene is included on the list of “allergenic” substances.”
Linalool: “In Europe, Linalool is included on the list of “allergenic” substances.”
Benzyl Salicylate: “In Europe, Benzyl Salicylate is included on the list of "allergenic" substances.”
Benzyl alcohol,
Butylphenyl Methylpropional: “In Europe, Butylphenyl Methylpropional is included on the list of "allergenic" substances.”
6 potential irritants out of 34 ingredients. Although that is not a bad statistic, the Cetrimonium chloride-issue seriously freaked me out. Do not like!
Conclusion
Until I read up on the ingredients I actually really liked this one. Now I’m paranoid that my sudden case of the greasies may be a result of irritation from the cetrimonium chloride. I think this one will go in the trashcan. 
 GTFO. 


Saturday, 22 September 2012

Reviews



I’ve been working on my very first “real” product reviews. I need to figure out my personal style. What I think is important to mention. What I should focus on and evaluate.
I was thinking of using the following points:

Looks and image
Because, well, I think it’s kind of funny to see what they use to hook customers. Is it the “scientific” Complexrepair Fast-acting Keratineconcrete Hair Mend Molecules (Patent pending) or is it the extract of African Silky Angel Wing Hibiscus petals they use to lure the consumers with?
Scent
Because everyone wants yummy-smelling hair!
Touch
How does the product feel on your hands? Light or greasy? Thick or runny?
Rinse ability
How easy or hard the product is to clean off your hands will give you a good idea of how easy or hard it is to rinse out of your hair. This can also give you a pointer to what kind of silicones you have in the product (This is a useful thing to know if you can’t find an ingredient list) if they are water soluble or not.
Usability
How is it in my hair? Difficult to “work”? Does it make my hair soft and shiny?
Price and value
Simple math of the price versus the amount of product. Good for comparing to the end-result.
Ingredients
Ingredient list if I can find one.
Conclusion
Because… Conclusion!

I was thinking of using a “scale” of 
Love!

 Thumbs up

 Meh. 

 No thanks

 GTFO. 

What do you give to a fellow longhair that you haven’t met?

When I was planning to go meet Growing2shine , I wanted to bring something nice for her. I decided to go for some argan oil since you shouldn’t go wrong with that. But then I felt it was a little too obvious and chanced it with getting her a silk bonnet from Pretty AnntoiNet's. It might not work for her, but maybe its one of those things you just haven’t thought to actually try.

I felt so bad for not being able to go that I decided to mail it to her. She should receive it today. 




Monday, 17 September 2012

Sick.


It stinks. Tomorrow I was going to meet up with Growing2shine but instead I’m just going to stay in bed and feel sorry for myself. Pout.

Edit: Just made this:


 Hm. Sick and all, maybe I’m still capable of getting something done? I do want to get some product revives done on my latest haul of leave in conditioners…

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

Bonjour Réunion!


One of the things I enjoy the most of having a blog is seeing the stats of where I get my visitors from. I think since I started blogging independently, I’ve had visitors from all over the world.
Even my hubby who is usually vaguely indifferent to how someone can find hair so interesting finds it fascinating so see where I get my visitors from.
Today I had visitors from Réunion and hubby and I spent quite a bit of time poking around on Google Maps and wishing we were there.

Hello readers from Réunion!


Edit: I just caught hubby checking out plane prices from Copenhagen to Roland Garros Airport…  

Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Tuesday, september 11th 2012


I talked to my grandfather on the phone Sunday. He was getting a cold and his voice sounded awful. Then I talked to my mother and she complained about the number of sick people she had in her workplace. Yep, the first waves of “Miserable mixed sickness” of the year are making its rounds.
I mentally congratulated hubby and I for having avoided getting sick. Of course it seems the goddess of Irony heard that because hubby and I woke up the next day feeling mildly crappy. I felt I had something stuck in the back of my throat and felt slightly warm.
I thought/hoped I could sleep it off yesterday if I stayed warm but I’m not feeling any better today.
In fact I had one of those bizarre dreams I usually get from being sick. I dreamt I was at this strange exotic market with Chemist and Biologist friend when Biochemist friend showed up and tearfully told us about how she had been driving a train and run over a pig. The train’s wheels had severed the pig’s ears and the pig had died from that (Eh?) And all the time in the dream I had short, brown hair. Like Rapunzel in the end of Tangled. I’ve had weird dreams about hair before but every time I have dreamt about doing something weird or drastic to my hair, it had somehow been the focus of the dream and been commented on. In this dream it was just there and no one commented on it, not even me.
I’ve had a lot of weird colours in my hair and been through a lot of awkward and unflattering growing out-styles but I think this style would be super unflattering on me!


Well, I’m going to stay warm, drink a lot of tea and go to bed early so I did a Nodosaurus with Schwarzkopf Gliss ultimate repair (The one with keratin) so I can keep my mane more like Rapunzel in the beginning of the movie…


I prefer my hair long thank you very much! 

Monday, 10 September 2012

Placebo


One of the things that thoroughly mystify me is the more or less random “hair growth boosting” recommendations that keeps circulating in the long hair circuit. Some of them seems to absolutely random. But I guess the weirdest thing is how absolutely sure and determined people are that their own special little booster is and how fantastic and amazing just their discovery is. It is as if they believe they discovered something truly magical or mystical. Things that people “Swear by!” are everything between particular scarves, tools, foods, techniques and supplements.


Let us take something random I have seen recommended “For super speedy hair growth!!!1”, like water chestnut. It’s not a nut at all, but a part of the root that we eat. It’s a delicious slightly sweet, crunchy thing often found in Chinese cuisine. 


There is nothing special or magical about it though. Here is an in depth analysis of the nutrition value of water chestnuts: Nutrition data
So what would make this crunchy, tasty little “nut” boost someone’s hair growth?
Is it that 100 gram of water chestnut contains 16% of your daily recommended allowance of vitamin B6 and 16% of your daily recommended allowance of copper? Is it the fibre and sugars in combination? Maybe a magical ratio of omega 3 fatty acids to mega 6 fatty acids? Or does it contain something truly magical that science can’t even measure?  

No?

Well, maybe water chestnuts would be a magical hair growth booster if your diet was low on vitamin B6 and copper, sure. Or maybe it is the extra attention it brings to your diet.

But here is my theory:


Of course traditional knowledge about placebo focuses solely on pills and the circumstances surrounding the pills, such as the enthusiasm of the person giving you the pills, the price and appearance of the pills etc.

This is a good and informational little video about it.



These covers a lot of the same but are still worth a watch.

I quite liked this article: Granted, its aimed at beauty products, but I think the authors points can be aimed at ”miracle growth cures” too. Placebo effect: believe your way to beauty results

I spent most of the night on Google looking for factors, but mostly placebo is documented about pills. I guess no researcher ever saw this knowledge used when it comes to women wanting to grow their hair long fast?


However, after way too many years in the longhair circuit I think traditional placebo definitions can be expanded:
The amount of trouble a “booster” causes will increase the effect. Sure massaging for 5 minutes every day will be good for your hair growth and probably cause people to see a growth spurt, but increasing it to 20 minutes and do it standing on your head and taking a special supplement with an expensive drink and incorporating a special food source in your diet will be extra good then, right? It’s basic psychology that humans want to see results equal to the amount of work you put in.
Positive environment and the amount of rave reviews will also “colour” peoples approach. If everyone else are seeing results and swearing by the new booster method, people will be more inclined to be positive towards it. This is also a common and well documented factor in placebo.


Important knowledge
  • It is common to experience a growth spurt if you change something in your diet or handling that your body is lacking.
  • Hair has often been described as “Being far down the body’s natural pecking order” meaning that if something is lacking in your diet, it will be used for the more important functions first. This is bad for our vanity but good for out survival. If you change your diet and will get enough of what was missing, it can temporarily boost your growth. This also applies to things like increasing circulation or decreasing handling damage.
  • It is hard to measure hair exactly. It really is. Most people who measure, will measure several times and either track the average or the number they measured the most.
  • The super fast growth is almost exclusively reported by the new members. This might not be very nice to point out, but those that claim they track several inches in a very short time seems to be gone by the next month anyways. The people looking for some fantastic magical booster and claim they have found it, always seems to just drift on to some other obsession. The only one I can think of with a very high growth rate who has been in the longhair circuit for years is Squiggyflop on LHC who seems to be at a stabile 2 inches of growth per month.
  • (Plus, and maybe its just me being paranoid here, but some times I find myself wondering if hair forums members are using their hair to “assert” themselves. They may not have the thickest hair or the curliest hair or whatever people seems to “compete” about but dang it, they have fast growth and have found the best method in the world because they’re so smart!)


If something really worked such a fantastic magic that you knew for sure, wouldn’t the whole world know by now and thinning, slow-growing hair been completely eliminated?


Just for fun, let’s do a little math here. My personal growth rate has always been 1,5 or 2 cm per month. Not impressive at all, but careful and conservative trimming has taken me from bald to knee length hair in 10½ years. People always assume I have a super high growth rate but I really don’t. I have simply managed to not shred my ends or have my hair butchered in 10+ years (Which is actually a big accomplishment I guess!)
Let’s say I really did get an inch a week, which isn’t actually a high number if you read some of the posts with high numbers people have reported. An inch a week would have gotten me to knee length-ish in just a year if I avoided trims. 
Of course that didn’t happen. In fact, that never happened to anyone. Ever.
Instead it took me about ten years.

Growth spurts do exist, but they are only spurts and don’t last. A lot of them are probably just measuring errors combined with too much optimism from putting in too much effort in your hair growth. It’s completely human with wishful thinking, but don’t put any trust in people who claim growth rates that seems too good to be true.

But hey, in the time it took you to read this post, you hair grew like 0,00083673 mm! My post is a magical hair growth booster! Read this 10 times a day to experience truly magical growth!


Of course placebo isn’t always a bad thing. A lot of the things people do in the name of hair aren’t bad at all. Who can object to fresh air and exercise? Or massages? Or paying extra attention to diet? Sleeping with a silk sleep cap?

No one would object to that, but the fact is still that the very best thing for good hair growth is the good old benign neglect and a well-rounded life where you don’t overdo anything to try to boost your hair growth. It’s the only thing that has ever proved effective to boost hair growth and hair quality over time. Don’t fool yourself with expensive, troublesome and time-consuming miracles.


(Pictures shamelessly stolen from someone who put herself out there with her “magical method” and then decided we were all mean old jealous bitches on UTT for disagreeing with her hair-frying methods and posted them as proof to how fantastic and smart she was and how stupid we all are. They make me laugh my mean old jealous head off.)

Sunday, 9 September 2012

Leave in conditioner is a pain in my…


Usch. Seriously. I found out yesterday I was dangerously low on my trusty Sunsilk leave in conditioner. I go through a bottle in about two weeks so I use quite a lot of it.
It has before been a pain in my behind to actually find the stuff, but usually I find it at H&M, usually for 39,40 Swedish Kronor but sometimes for sale at 19,90.
In my book it’s the only leave in conditioner I’ve been able to find here that I want to pay for. I can get these hysterically expensive products plastered with praise and their pseudo-scientific promises on the packaging (But really truly is just only a bunch of cones) or I can find heat protecting sprays (Hah. If this stuff is so awesome at protecting from heat, why don’t we coat our fire-fighters in it and skip the big heavy suits?) but what I really want is a fairly simple cream based one.
So long story short: I went to the nearest H&M. I wanted to stay in and be lazy, but had to get off my ass and get dressed. Booh. I was in a bad mood before I even left the house.
Unfortunately they were out of “my” leave in and low on Sunsilk products in general. Sigh.
Then I went the long way to the H&M out at the Nova mall. They were out too! Argh!
When I asked for my product, the blank-eyed bimbo working there just twirled her bleached hair between her fingers and said “We never had such a product.” Usch.


Have I mentioned how deeply I despise women of her kind and how I blame them for the problems smart women face?
My mood was pretty shot even when a smarter employee there could inform me that their Sunsilk shipment had been late. Alright. I still had no other choice than just buying some other products in the meantime.
So I ended up buying 3 new products just to try them. Maybe I should make some actual product reviews for once?

Left to right…
  • Scandinavia Formula glansdroppar (“Shine drops”) bought at Åhlens for 40 kronor (50 ml)
  • My trusty old Sunsilk bought at H&M for 20 kronor (200 ml)
  • L’Oreal Everpure kasting moisture leave in-crème bought at H&M for 109 kronor (150 ml)
  • L’Oreal extraordinary oil (SPF version) bought at H&M for 119 kronor (100 ml)
  • Schwarzkopf Gliss hair repair bought at H&M for 69,50 kronor (125 ml)